Teaching

I see my students as whole people first. Everything else follows from that.

When I'm teaching, I'm only seeing a tiny fraction of someone's life. Seventy-five minutes, maybe 150, a few times a week. I know that. And I try to make sure my students know I know that — because it changes everything about how I show up in the classroom.

Most of my students have a lot going on. Jobs, families, other courses, mental health, life. That's not an excuse for anything — it's just reality. And pretending it doesn't exist doesn't make me a more rigorous instructor. It just makes me a less effective one.

I want to spread grace like confetti. But I'm also an accountability partner — emphasis on partner, not hard ass.

That tension is real and I sit in it on purpose. I extend grace wherever I can, because I want students to take care of themselves and find some kind of balance in their lives — a balance that's going to keep shifting for the rest of their lives, by the way, as learning stays some fraction of the pie no matter what age you are. But there are also standards. There are things we need to accomplish. And when there isn't wiggle room, I'm going to be honest about that and hold the line — just not like a jerk about it.


Authenticity over performance

I'm going to show up to class as myself. That means I'm real, I'm honest, and yes — on more than one occasion — something colorful is going to come out of my mouth. Not because I'm trying to be edgy, but because that's genuinely who I am. And I want students to feel like they can do the same. What I won't tolerate is anything that makes other people in the room feel unsafe, disrespected, or unwelcome. We're a learning community. That means everyone gets to be here, and everyone deserves to feel like they belong.

Facilitator, not sage on stage

I designed the course. I wrote the learning outcomes. I selected the readings. Sure — that comes from some degree of expertise. But it would be pretty arrogant to walk into a room full of people with their own expertise, their own lived experiences, and their own ways of knowing, and act like I'm the only one with something valuable to say. I'm not. I'm a facilitator. My job is to create the conditions for learning, not to perform it at people. When we're together in a room, I want that time to actually mean something — conversation, activity, reflection — not a PowerPoint someone could have read at home.

Constructivism + metacognition

I learn best by doing, and I think most people do. But doing alone isn't enough — you have to understand what you did and why it worked for the learning to actually stick. That combination of active engagement and reflection is where real learning happens. It doesn't always happen within a 15-week semester. Sometimes I'm just pushing the rock and hoping the momentum builds later. That's okay. I'm planting things, not harvesting them.

Assessments that go somewhere

I've never given a multiple choice summative assessment and I don't intend to start. Low-stakes knowledge checks? Sure, fine, useful. But anything that actually matters should produce something — an artifact, a project, a demonstration of real understanding that a student can take with them when the course ends. I want students to be able to point to their work and say "I made this." Better yet, I want them to be able to talk about it in a job interview.

Learning that means something outside the room

I always know students are taking a course for something that's coming next — a job, graduate school, a career pivot, sometimes just personal growth. I don't always know what that is. But it shapes how I teach. The content matters, but so do the transferable things — how to communicate, collaborate, present, think critically under pressure. I want what happens in my courses to actually prepare people for wherever they're going, not just help them pass.


Current & recent

FYS 102: Decoding AI
UMBC · Undergraduate

A first-year seminar on AI literacy — what AI is, how it works, what it can and can't do, and how to think critically about it as a technology that's already reshaping work, education, and everyday life. Designed for students who have no technical background and a lot of questions.

SP2025 · FA2025 · SP2026 · FA2026
From Authentic Learning to Competency Recognition: Designing Microcredentials at UMBC
UMBC · Faculty development

An asynchronous faculty development course I designed and built for UMBC instructors interested in developing microcredential programs. Covers competency frameworks, badge design, assessment alignment, and navigating the MRB proposal process. Part eportfolio, part practical workshop.

Ongoing
TLPL 600: Teaching and Learning with Technology
University of Maryland · Graduate

A graduate-level course on the intersection of pedagogy and educational technology. I served as substitute instructor for five weeks in Spring 2024, covering online course design, learning management systems, and emerging technologies in higher education contexts.

SP2024 · Substitute instructor (5 weeks)

Earlier teaching

Introduction to an Honors University
UMBC · Undergraduate

A first-year seminar designed to help students transition into university life — building academic skills, connecting with campus resources, and starting to figure out who they are as learners. Taught across multiple departments, all anchored in the same core experience.

FA2019 (SOCY 101Y) · SP2020 (AGNG 100Y) · FA2020 (AGNG 101Y) · FA2021 (COMP 100Y)
IS 125: Information Systems Logic and Structured Design
UMBC · Undergraduate

An introductory course in structured problem solving and logical design for information systems students. Covers data representation, logical tools for programming preparation, and foundational Microsoft Office skills. A good reminder that I can teach things that aren't about credentials.

SP2022